Friday, August 12, 2011

WHOSE PHOTOS HAVE I TAKEN?

1)  Bird one…maybe he best of the photos overall. 
I am bird stymied. A double whammy, mind you…two different birds (or maybe both members of the same species, for all I know) that appeared at my window late yesterday, maybe ten minutes apart, when the light was almost gone—neither of which do I feel certain of correctly identifying. Vireo? Warbler? Two species? One? Male? Female? Immature? Adult? Summer plumage? Fall cloak? 

I have plenty of questions and no firm answers. 

2)  Bird two…the only usable shot of this bird of the lot.
I did manage quick shots of both birds—and yes, I know the shots are of wretched quality. The light was really low and I was afraid there wasn't time enough to change the ISO settings on the camera—so I shot with my usual 200 setting. Obviously, the images are seriously underexposed. 

3)  
After uploading the images, I looked through various field guides and a number of online images…but the more I looked, the more confused and uncertain I became. They were both small birds, though bird two was smaller than bird one. 

Below is the one of the straight–out-of-the-camera images I had to work with, just so you can see the degree of underexposure. 

4) The is a typical underexposed shot—way too dark to be usable.
I've manipulated and tweaked the recorded images to the best of my very limited post-production technical skills and possibly the software I possess—though whining about a software upgrade is just an excuse; I dopubtless couldn't do an iota better if I owned the full version of PhotoShop and a dozen plugs-ins, incompetence rather than equipment being the limiting factor.

5) 
Not only was the light low, but the bird which appears in photos 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6, was under the dense canopy of my canna lilies, and in shadows which added an overall green cast to what little light there was. I've tried to correct for that cast, though I'd say the bird's head and cape feathers were somewhat more golden than in my images.  

6)  
My best guess for bird number two is a female Northern Parula. Bird number one might be a female Prothonotary Warbler. If you can figure out whose portraits I've take—albeit badly—whether I'm wrong (the smart money bet) or right (a miracle!) I'd appreciate your input and help.   
——————— 

15 comments:

Gail said...

HI GRIZZ-

amazing pics. wow. I am no expert, but I have a reference for ya. We have 'wild parakeets' here that look a lot like the birds you have pictured.
hmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Love Gail
peace...... photographed.

Grizz………… said...

Gail…

Well, I'm no expert, either…or I else wouldn't be asking for help, right? But the birds I've heard most folks call "wild parakeets" are goldfinches—which hang around my feeders daily, winter and summer, by the truckload.

This bird (bird one in the post) was the same color gold, maybe a bit darker, and close to the same size—maybe a tad larger—but definitely not a goldfinch. Possibly a vireo, though I don't think so, more likely a warbler; and being at the best of times warbler-challenged, it's the which one, what sex, which plumage, and what age considerations that have me stumped.

bonifer said...

Hi Grizz,
Enjoy your blog so much to start with!! :)
In my young birders guide, I would say the one with more yellow is a
"Prothonotary Warbler", check it out and see if you don't agree, and it is in your area too. Not sure on the other one..
Bonnie

ellen abbott said...

I think it's a warbler. It looks very much like one that winters over here.

The Weaver of Grass said...

I would be immensely proud of any one of those shots Grizz - they ae all wonderful to my eyes. As for identification - no idea. All those US birds are foreigners to me!

AfromTO said...

don't know anything about birds-except the ones I eat-but photo no.3 is stunning -beautifully shot with the light on the plants.

Grizz………… said...

Bonifer…

Well, as I said in the post, a female Prothonotary Warbler was my best guess for bird number one …though only a guess. Maybe I got it right, huh?

I'm glad you enjoy the blog. Don't be a stranger. I appreciate your nice comments and help. Thank you.

Grizz………… said...

Ellen…

Yes, I agree—warbler…but which warbler? Warblers are one of my bird nemeses, along with sandpipers, terns, gulls, and, uh, a bunch of those mystifying little brown jobs. :-)

Thank you.

Grizz………… said...

Weaver…

Thank you for saying you like the photos, but in all honesty, I would be satisfied with some of the frames if I'd not so seriously underexposed the lot. If I knew what the birds in question were, I'd have never put a single one of these pix up the blog. But once again, curiosity has trumped vanity. Probably a good thing…

Grizz………… said...

AfromTo…

Thank you. That one emerged from the terrible underexposure and harsh contrast into an okay shot—or it would have been if I'd have meant to do it this way, though the bird's colors are still a bit off and I'm not able to correct them. But really, not good photographic work on my part.

Robin said...

How strange. I just learned about your first bird this morning.... and if it is.... apparently you are very lucky indeed.

Go to natureremains.blogspot.com and read.

Let me know what you think.

~

Robin said...

Okay. Now I see that either I found you thru natureremains.blogspot.com or vice-versa.

Duh.

Grizz………… said...

Robin x 2…

Regarding Nina's blog, "Nature Remains"…she photographs and writes wonderfully, and I've read it regularly for several years. In fact, it was, in part, the great job she did with her blog that made me decide to try a blog myself.

I had sort of forgotten that a recent post of hers dealt with Prothonotary Warblers.

Part of my identification issues with both birds in my post is that it was really late in the day, the light was low—lower than it appears even in the "straight" unmanipulated pix—the birds were mostly in shadow, and much of the time, under the canopy of canna leaves…all of which made them difficult to see, let alone photograph. And of course, I'm admittedly not a great birder.

When I think of Prothonotary Warblers, I always think of the bright gold males, which are stunning and distinctive. Those are the ones I see most often around the edges of lakes and ponds where there's flooded standing timber. I always see a few each year, so they're reasonably familiar. But I have much less experience spotting females. So my i.d. is, at best, shaky, and I'm really not sure whether it is right or not.

The other bird—which I think is also a warbler—is even more of a mystery to me. Northern Parula is barely more than a guess based on more or less matching the photo to others in my field guides; my pix seems closer to this species than any other—but it's a bad photo and weak guess.

I wish I were a more competent birder.

bonifer said...

Thanks Grizz, I won't be a stranger!! :)

Grizz………… said...

Bonifer…

Good! I'm glad, and look forward to hearing from you.